Nissan Altima Named 2011 Used Car Best Bet in Mid Size Sedan Category
Recently,
Edmunds.com put together a 2011 Used Car Best Bets list. The researches at
Edmunds evaluated thousands of vehicles. They looked at compact sedans, large crossovers/
suvs, and everything in between. When evaluating the vehicles for the list they considered factors such as
reliability, value, safety, and availability. They also limited eligibility to 2004-2009 year models because older models usually have
higher mileage and newer models haven't depreciated enough. In the end, there was only one car selected for each category and the Nissan
Altima was selected as the Best Bet for the
Mid size Sedan category.
It is no surprise that the Nissan
Altima was selected, and
Edmunds.com had several good reasons for why the
Altima came out on top. The
Altima is not your parents sedan. It has seating for 5 people, while having athletic handling and strong performance, especially if the
Altima is equipped with a V6 engine. In 2007, the
Altima was redesigned inside and out. The exterior has lots of luxury car elements while the interior was soft and sleek. That same year, Nissan offered the
CVT (
continuously variable transmission) that made the ride smoother and increased fuel
efficiency. Also in 2007, Nissan
made a hybrid version of the
Altima, but it was only available in 8 states.
So, if you are shopping for a used car, and you want one that is fun to drive, yet has room for you, your family, and your friends, then the Nissan Altima is your car. And after purchasing your vehicle, don't forget to purchase your Nissan Extended Warranty to protect you, and your wallet, from high cost repairs should they be needed.
Labels: nissan extended warranty
What is the difference between a warranty, extended warranty and service contract?
As stated by the FTC. A service contract (Nissan Security+Plus) is a promise to perform (or pay for) certain repairs or services. Sometimes called an "Nissan Extended Warranty," a service contract is not a warranty as defined by federal law. A service contract may be arranged at any time and always costs extra; a warranty comes with a new car and is included in the original price.
The separate and additional cost distinguishes a service contract from a warranty.
Labels: extended warranty, factory warranty, nissan warranty pricing
Nissan set to Increase Extended Warranty pricing effective April 1st, 2010
Nissan vehicle owners, we wanted to let you in on a little secret.
The folks over at Nissan occasionally find it important to review their mechanical breakdown claims that fall under coverage for the
Nissan Security+Plus suite of products. Nissan does extensive research and analysis of these claims to come up with adjustments of pricing of their Nissan extended warranty (aka extended service contract) pricing sent out to Nissan dealers nationwide.
As a Nissan dealer that sells the
Nissan extended warranty to consumers just like yourself. We wanted to let you know what we have have typically experienced. Historically we have experienced price increases from between 4-12%, depending on the year, model and mileage of your Nissan vehicle.
This could be a cost savings of up to $400 on some plans.
So if you are considering an extended auto warranty please keep in mind that Nissan will release their historical pricing adjustment to all Nissan dealers nationwide. These new
extended warranty rates will be effective on April 1st.
Your Nissan Factory WarrantyWhile your 3 year or 36,000 mile Nissan factory warranty is complimentary to your new car purchase, it does not provide you the coverage you deserve.
Nissan Security+Plus Gold Preferred goes the extra mile by covering belts and hoses, providing Roadside Assistance, Trip Interuption, Sign and Drive service with car rental and in the event of mechanical breakdown, towing to your nearest Nissan dealership.
Read more...Labels: auto warranty, nissan, nissan extended warranty, nissan warranty pricing
Helpful Tips On Purchasing A Nissan Extended Warranty
Helpful tips to consider when making a purchasing decision about Nissan Extended Warranty coverage for your Nissan vehicle. Is a factory backed extended warranty the best choice or would an aftermarket auto warranty fit my needs and budget?
Whenever researching an Nissan Extended Warranty, keep these helpful tips on purchasing an auto warranty in mind:
- Always ask for the actual (or sample) copy of the service agreement that you will be purchasing. This allows for you to identify items that may or may not be covered under the product.
- Always call your local ASE certified repair shop and Nissan dealership. Ask them if they accept or have had dealt with the Nissan Extended Warranty (a.k.a. extended service contract) you are considering. This will give you a good read on whether the company you are considering actually pays their claims.
- Have questions about what is covered and what is not? Call the claims number on the service agreement you requested earlier. This will allow you to see how quick and how knowledgeable the companies claim department is with its customers. Not just how quick their sales department is! If they have it, also ask for a complete list of components that are covered by the plan.
- Always check A.M. Best rating of the administrator of the product. This should be an A or better, if at all possible.
- Always check with the BBB for the rating on the seller and administrator of the product. Yes, these are often times different.
- Never purchase an Nissan extended warranty from a company that will not provide you with contact information (eg. address, phone number, etc).
Consumer Auto Warranty Quote:
"I wouldn't take a third party warranty if my life depended on it. There's nothing but horror stories everywhere, about them. I've purchased Nissan factory plans on every vehicle I've owned over the years and I can say without a doubt factory plans are the best option, if you're into purchasing these types of things" .... titanguy10
A factory-backed warranty is usually a better way to go, says Stacey Bradford an consumer action author at SmartMoney.com There are numerous reasons for agreeing with Stacey's statement here. Whether it be an independent shop or a dealer that would be working on your vehicle, they all have pre-conceived perceptions about working with an Nissan aftermarket warranty or a Nissan factory-backed plan.
Their perceptions are driven by the experience they have with the warranty companies handling of the mechanical breakdown claims. Talking with any of them would lead you to a stories about lengthy inspections, lack of full payment or lack of confidence in the ability for the consumers repair to be fully covered. Stacey further went on to say: "the factory-backed warranties come from the manufacturers themselves, [where] there's more of an incentive to keep their customers happy.
Remember - eligibility for a Nissan factory backed extended warranty (a.k.a. service contract) is available while under Nissan factory warranty for Nissan Security+Plus Gold Preferred (the best vehicle coverage that Nissan offers). Plus you may still be eligible for a Nissan Security+Plus Pre-Owned plan if you are less than 5 years and 60k miles from original purchase date. As a Nissan owner, factory backed coverage is worth consideration.
For an Nissan auto warranty quote specific to the Nissan vehicle you own please visit: http://www.vadennissanwarranty.com/
Labels: aftermarket warranty, auto warranty, factory warranty, Gold Preferred, nissan extended warranty, nissan owners, nissan recalls, security plus
Missouri Attorney General Pursuing Scammers
Attorney General’s News Release
November 12, 2009
Attorney General Koster files lawsuits against six separate vehicle extended warranty companies
Kansas City, Mo. — Attorney General Chris Koster today warned consumers about new tactics businesses are using to try to trick people into purchasing bogus auto warranty products of limited value. Koster filed lawsuits against six such businesses today.
According to Koster, the businesses marketed what appeared to be “extended auto warranties” to consumers, but actually were “service contracts” or “automotive additives.” Many consumers did not realize they were not receiving auto warranties until they received the package in the mail. The companies sold the products as service contracts and auto additives with the effect of avoiding Missouri’s service contract laws, which provide some minimal protection for consumers.
Customers who purchased “service contracts” often later realized the significant limits to coverage. Many contracts contain a 30 to 90 day, 1,000 mile period during which consumers cannot make claims, because that is considered a “pre-existing condition” of the vehicle. However, the extended service contract is only fully refundable within the first 30 days. Customers asked for a cancellation or refund when they discovered the provider would not pay a claim after that initial period, but were refused refunds because they were not within the 30-day cancellation timeframe. Many of the contracts have also been promoted as extending a warranty for 7 years and 100,000 miles. These companies do not tell the consumer that the coverage may be limited to the actual cash value of the vehicle. For an older, high-mileage vehicle, the coverage may soon be less than the price paid by the consumer for the contract.
For companies using the auto additive scam, customers were sent a bottle of fluid for their car’s transmission, engine, or cooling system, with instructions to immediately add it to the vehicle. Customers were instructed to install the additive in order for the warranty to be valid. But they later were denied a refund and told the purchase is non-refundable if the product has been used. In effect, the companies encouraged consumers to use the fluids immediately, knowing that would nullify their opportunity for a refund. Many consumers did not request the additive and did not realize they would be sent this additive until they received the packet.
“These businesses are using a ‘bait and switch’ scheme and preying on consumers’ fears of not having adequate vehicle warranty coverage,” Koster said. “They lured vulnerable consumers into purchasing ‘auto warranties,’ and then switched to sell them into service contracts and auto additive warranties with inferior or negligible repair coverage, while making it almost impossible for the consumers to cancel the contract or get refunds.
“I believe this auto warranty business continues to be rife with fraud, and Missouri continues to be at the center of this deception,” Koster said. “This office will continue to pursue and prosecute businesses such as these that target unsuspecting, innocent consumers.”
Koster said the companies marketed these products using misleading letters, postcards, and telemarketing techniques, some also in violation of Missouri’s No-Call law. He said the businesses would lead consumers to mistakenly believe their current vehicle warranties were about to expire and that they would not have another opportunity to purchase an extended warranty unless they acted immediately. Many potential customers were not informed that the businesses were not affiliated with the dealership or manufacturer from whom the customers bought their vehicles.
In addition, some of the businesses sought to illegally obtain the consumer’s bank account or credit card information by misrepresenting the purpose of the information. The businesses would then cause automatic charges to consumers’ bank accounts or monthly charges to their credit cards without the consumers’ permission or knowledge.
The six businesses Koster filed suit against today are:
* National Dealers Warranty, Inc., d/b/a/ StopRepairBills.com
* Warranty Activation Headquarters, Inc., d/b/a/ Nationwide Automotive Protection
* Extended Warranty Corporation, Inc., d/b/a/ Key Protection Group
* Dealers Warranty, LLC, d/b/a/ MOGI
* U.S. Auto Warranty
* Dealer Warranty Services
Koster’s suits charge the businesses with unfair and deceptive practices violations. Some were also charged with violations of Missouri’s No-Call law. In addition, he charged National Dealers Warranty with violation of a prior Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction issued by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County in 2008, and Warranty Activation Headquarters with violation of a prior Assurance of Voluntary Compliance approved by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in 2008.
Koster is asking the court to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions requiring the companies to comply with Missouri’s Merchandising Practices Act; provide full restitution to victims and to the state; and pay civil penalties and court costs.
Koster encourages consumers who have complaints about businesses selling motor vehicle extended service contracts to contact the Attorney General’s Office at ago.mo.gov or by phone calling the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection hotline at 1-800-392-8222.
Inquiries from consumers should be directed to consumer@ago.mo.gov or 1-800-392-8222 (from within Missouri) or 573-751-3321 (outside Missouri).
All media inquiries should be directed to the Press Secretary.
E-mail Phone: 573-751-8844 Fax: 573-751-5818
Labels: attorney general, bbb, consumer protection, extended warranty, extended warranty companies, lawsuits, service contract
Nissan and San Francisco plan to develop EV charging network
On behalf of the Bay Area EV Corridor Program, Nissan and San Francisco are working to advance zero emission mobility by promoting the development of an electric vehicle charging network in the nine county region. Nissan has committed to making the LEAF commercially available in the Bay Area on it debut in December 2010. The Bay Area EV Corrifor Program was formed as the organizational structure through which the participants cordinate efforts to make the region EV ready. Nissan operations in North America include automotive design, engineering, consumer and corporate financing, sales and marketing, distribution and manufacturing. Nissan is dedicated to improving the environment through reducing CO2 and other emissions and recycling.
November sales announced
Nissan North America reported announced sales for November at 56,288 units. An increase of 20.8 percent in sales compared to November of last year. Nissan Division sales rose 29.9 percent for the month while sales of Infiniti vehicles were 26 percent lower than a year ago.
50,644 Nissan vehicles sold in November 2009, a 29.9 percent increase compared with the 38,974 units sold in November 2008. Vehicles showing significant sales increases included Maxima, Altima, Frontier and Xterra.
Infiniti sales for November 2009 were 5,644 units, down 26 percent comparied to November of last years 7,631. November sales for the G Coupe went up 23.3 percent, sales of the FX rose 13.6 percent to 776 units sold in November 2009, compared with the 683 sales in November of 2008.